You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Vitamin D Supplementation for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention
|
---|---|
Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, October 2011
|
DOI | 10.1001/jama.2011.1465 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
James H. O[rsquo]Keefe, Carl J. Lavie, Michael F. Holick |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 43% |
Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 30 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 16% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 10% |
Other | 8 | 26% |
Unknown | 5 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 45% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 16% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
Materials Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 5 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2017.
All research outputs
#5,338,695
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#18,995
of 36,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,536
of 148,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#101
of 271 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,409 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.5. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 271 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.