You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cost-effectiveness of dialectical behaviour therapy vs. enhanced usual care in the treatment of adolescents with self-harm
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13034-018-0227-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Egil Haga, Eline Aas, Berit Grøholt, Anita J. Tørmoen, Lars Mehlum |
| Abstract |
Studies have shown that dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT) is effective in reducing self-harm in adults and adolescents. To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of DBT for adolescents (DBT-A) compared to enhanced usual care (EUC). In a randomised study, 77 adolescents with repeated self-harm were allocated to 19 weeks of outpatient treatment, either DBT-A (n = 39) or EUC (n = 38). Cost-effective analyses, including estimation of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, were conducted with self-harm and global functioning (CGAS) as health outcomes. Using self-harm as effect outcome measure, the probability of DBT being cost-effective compared to EUC increased with increasing willingness to pay up to a ceiling of 99.5% (threshold of € 1400), while with CGAS as effect outcome measure, this ceiling was 94.9% (threshold of € 1600). Given the data, DBT-A had a high probability of being a cost-effective treatment. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 115 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 11% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 17% |
| Unknown | 39 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 39 | 34% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 47 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2018.
All research outputs
#3,226,362
of 23,045,021 outputs
Outputs from Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health
#149
of 664 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,380
of 325,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,045,021 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 664 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.