↓ Skip to main content

Subcellular Heterogeneity of Ryanodine Receptor Properties in Ventricular Myocytes with Low T-Tubule Density

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Subcellular Heterogeneity of Ryanodine Receptor Properties in Ventricular Myocytes with Low T-Tubule Density
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0025100
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liesbeth Biesmans, Niall Macquaide, Frank R. Heinzel, Virginie Bito, Godfrey L. Smith, Karin R. Sipido

Abstract

In ventricular myocytes of large mammals, not all ryanodine receptor (RyR) clusters are associated with T-tubules (TTs); this fraction increases with cellular remodeling after myocardial infarction (MI).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 40 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 33%
Researcher 8 19%
Professor 7 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 4 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 12%
Engineering 4 10%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 7 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2011.
All research outputs
#20,147,309
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#172,584
of 193,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,936
of 135,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,393
of 2,569 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,422 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,569 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.