You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Subcellular Heterogeneity of Ryanodine Receptor Properties in Ventricular Myocytes with Low T-Tubule Density
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2011
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0025100 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Liesbeth Biesmans, Niall Macquaide, Frank R. Heinzel, Virginie Bito, Godfrey L. Smith, Karin R. Sipido |
Abstract |
In ventricular myocytes of large mammals, not all ryanodine receptor (RyR) clusters are associated with T-tubules (TTs); this fraction increases with cellular remodeling after myocardial infarction (MI). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 40 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 33% |
Researcher | 8 | 19% |
Professor | 7 | 17% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 12% |
Unknown | 4 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 26% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 26% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 12% |
Engineering | 4 | 10% |
Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 7 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2011.
All research outputs
#20,147,309
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#172,584
of 193,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,936
of 135,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,393
of 2,569 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,422 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,569 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.