↓ Skip to main content

Less immune activation following social stress in rural vs. urban participants raised with regular or no animal contact, respectively

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
67 news outlets
blogs
10 blogs
twitter
405 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
googleplus
4 Google+ users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
189 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Less immune activation following social stress in rural vs. urban participants raised with regular or no animal contact, respectively
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, April 2018
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1719866115
Pubmed ID
Authors

Till S. Böbel, Sascha B. Hackl, Dominik Langgartner, Marc N. Jarczok, Nicolas Rohleder, Graham A. Rook, Christopher A. Lowry, Harald Gündel, Christiane Waller, Stefan O. Reber

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 405 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 189 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 11%
Researcher 20 11%
Student > Master 17 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 8%
Other 38 20%
Unknown 51 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 11%
Psychology 19 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 8%
Neuroscience 12 6%
Other 31 16%
Unknown 66 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 873. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2024.
All research outputs
#21,509
of 26,367,288 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#651
of 104,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#415
of 342,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#15
of 989 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,367,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104,784 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 989 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.