| Title |
3.3-million-year-old stone tools from Lomekwi 3, West Turkana, Kenya
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature14464 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sonia Harmand, Jason E. Lewis, Craig S. Feibel, Christopher J. Lepre, Sandrine Prat, Arnaud Lenoble, Xavier Boës, Rhonda L. Quinn, Michel Brenet, Adrian Arroyo, Nicholas Taylor, Sophie Clément, Guillaume Daver, Jean-Philip Brugal, Louise Leakey, Richard A. Mortlock, James D. Wright, Sammy Lokorodi, Christopher Kirwa, Dennis V. Kent, Hélène Roche |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 598 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 109 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 42 | 7% |
| Japan | 21 | 4% |
| Spain | 16 | 3% |
| Canada | 14 | 2% |
| France | 12 | 2% |
| Germany | 9 | 2% |
| Kenya | 7 | 1% |
| Australia | 7 | 1% |
| Other | 68 | 11% |
| Unknown | 293 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 507 | 85% |
| Scientists | 62 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 18 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 916 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| Portugal | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Lithuania | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | <1% |
| Unknown | 888 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 186 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 138 | 15% |
| Researcher | 121 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 104 | 11% |
| Professor | 51 | 6% |
| Other | 154 | 17% |
| Unknown | 162 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 184 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 143 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 132 | 14% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 55 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 29 | 3% |
| Other | 158 | 17% |
| Unknown | 215 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2052. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2024.
All research outputs
#4,494
of 25,807,758 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#476
of 98,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28
of 281,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#7
of 1,014 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,807,758 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,835 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,014 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.