↓ Skip to main content

Clinical Features of Emergency Department Patients Presenting with Symptoms Suggestive of Acute Cardiac Ischemia: A Multicenter Study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, July 1998
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
144 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical Features of Emergency Department Patients Presenting with Symptoms Suggestive of Acute Cardiac Ischemia: A Multicenter Study
Published in
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, July 1998
DOI 10.1023/a:1008876322599
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Hector Pope, Robin Ruthazer, Joni R. Beshansky, John L Griffith, Harry P. Selker

Abstract

Identification of patients with acute cardiac ischemia (ACI) remains challenging. The object of this study was to examine the role of clinical findings in the diagnosis/triage of emergency department (ED) patients with symptoms suggestive of ACI. The study was designed as a secondary data analysis of a multicenter prospective controlled clinical trial. It was set in 10 midwest, southeast, and northeast U.S. hospitals, and 10,689 patients with chest pain or other symptoms suggesting ACI presenting from May 1993 to December 1993, participated. The results indicated that ACI patients were more likely to have chest pain as a chief complaint or presenting symptom (P = 0.001). The presenting symptom of nausea was more commonly associated with a final diagnosis of ACI (P = 0.003). Shortness of breath as the chief complaint and presenting symptoms of abdominal pain, nausea, dizziness, and fainting were less frequent among patients with a final diagnosis of ACI (P = 0.001). A past history of diabetes mellitus, myocardial infarction, or angina pectoris was more frequently associated with a final diagnosis of ACI (P = 0.001). A lower pulse rate in patients with a final diagnosis of ACI (P = 0.001) was not considered clinically significant. Median first and highest systolic blood pressures (SBPs) were higher, median lowest SBPs were lower, median diastolic blood pressure of the lowest SBPs were lower, and initial and highest pulse pressures were wider in patients with a final diagnosis of ACl (P = 0.001). On arrival, these blood pressure variables in AMI patients, subsequently classified as Killip class 4, were above the threshold for this classification. Rales were more commonly present in patients with a final diagnosis of ACI (P = 0.001). All primary ST-segment abnormalities, Q waves, and T-wave abnormalities, except T-wave flattening, were seen more frequently in patients with a final diagnosis ACI (P = 0.001). Normal ECGs were more frequently associated with a non-ACI final diagnosis, yet 20% of AMI patients and 37% of Unstable Angina Pectoris (UAP) patients had normal ECGs. It can be concluded that certain clinical features can help to identify ED patients with ACI. Initially normal ECGs can be seen in 20% of patients with AMI and 37% of patients with UAP. Patients with ACI can present with "normal" blood pressures and develop cardiogenic shock. Clinical outcome data for ACI patients are presented.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Unknown 52 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 11 20%
Student > Bachelor 8 15%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 8 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 52%
Physics and Astronomy 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 14 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2016.
All research outputs
#6,597,517
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis
#247
of 1,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,182
of 32,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,064 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 32,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them