The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Supportive therapy for schizophrenia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004716.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lucy A Buckley, Nicola Maayan, Karla Soares‐Weiser, Clive E Adams |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 365 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 363 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 68 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 51 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 10% |
| Researcher | 27 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 5% |
| Other | 44 | 12% |
| Unknown | 120 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 69 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 60 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 43 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 35 | 10% |
| Unknown | 134 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2024.
All research outputs
#2,933,440
of 26,177,525 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,543
of 13,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,756
of 279,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#116
of 252 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,177,525 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,190 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 252 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.