You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Normative Beliefs About Aggression as a Mediator of Narcissistic Exploitativeness and Cyberbullying
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Interpersonal Violence, December 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1177/0886260510388286 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rebecca P. Ang, Kit-Aun Tan, Abu Talib Mansor |
| Abstract |
The current study examined normative beliefs about aggression as a mediator between narcissistic exploitativeness and cyberbullying using two Asian adolescent samples from Singapore and Malaysia. Narcissistic exploitativeness was significantly and positively associated with cyberbullying and normative beliefs about aggression and normative beliefs about aggression were significantly and positively associated with cyberbullying. Normative beliefs about aggression were a significant partial mediator in both samples; these beliefs about aggression served as one possible mechanism of action by which narcissistic exploitativeness could exert its influence on cyberbullying. Findings extended previous empirical research by showing that such beliefs can be the mechanism of action not only in offline but also in online contexts and across cultures. Cyberbullying prevention and intervention efforts should include modification of norms and beliefs supportive of the legitimacy and acceptability of cyberbullying. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 7 | 50% |
| Unknown | 7 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 93% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 219 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 38 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 15% |
| Researcher | 16 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 41 | 18% |
| Unknown | 41 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 87 | 38% |
| Social Sciences | 34 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 9% |
| Unknown | 53 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2014.
All research outputs
#1,661,702
of 25,233,554 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Interpersonal Violence
#370
of 3,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,702
of 193,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Interpersonal Violence
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,233,554 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,362 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.