↓ Skip to main content

Cannabinoids in neurology – Brazilian Academy of Neurology

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cannabinoids in neurology – Brazilian Academy of Neurology
Published in
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, April 2015
DOI 10.1590/0004-282x20150041
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sonia M D Brucki, Norberto Anísio Frota, Pedro Schestatsky, Adélia Henriques Souza, Valentina Nicole Carvalho, Maria Luiza Giraldes Manreza, Maria Fernanda Mendes, Elizabeth Comini-Frota, Cláudia Vasconcelos, Vitor Tumas, Henrique B Ferraz, Egberto Barbosa, Mauro Eduardo Jurno

Abstract

The use of cannabidiol in some neurological conditions was allowed by Conselho Regional de Medicina de São Paulo and by Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (ANVISA). Specialists on behalf of Academia Brasileira de Neurologia prepared a critical statement about use of cannabidiol and other cannabis derivatives in neurological diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 159 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 31 19%
Student > Master 20 13%
Other 10 6%
Professor 9 6%
Researcher 9 6%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 60 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 8%
Neuroscience 7 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 67 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2015.
All research outputs
#15,738,224
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#662
of 1,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,908
of 279,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#13
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,369 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.