↓ Skip to main content

MICAI 2006: Advances in Artificial Intelligence

Overview of attention for article published in Lecture notes in computer science, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
MICAI 2006: Advances in Artificial Intelligence
Published in
Lecture notes in computer science, January 2006
DOI 10.1007/11925231
ISBNs
978-3-54-049026-5, 978-3-54-049058-6
Authors

Alexander Gelbukh, Carlos Alberto Reyes-Garcia

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Unknown 16 84%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Design 1 5%
Unknown 16 84%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2012.
All research outputs
#866,548
of 3,790,511 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#15
of 79 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,713
of 56,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,790,511 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 63rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 79 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 56,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them