The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Electropalatography for articulation disorders associated with cleft palate
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006854.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alice S‐Y Lee, James Law, Fiona E. Gibbon |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 173 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 10% |
| Researcher | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 17% |
| Unknown | 54 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 11% |
| Psychology | 15 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 7% |
| Linguistics | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 10% |
| Unknown | 62 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2013.
All research outputs
#8,745,608
of 25,887,951 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,729
of 13,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,538
of 123,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#50
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,887,951 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.