↓ Skip to main content

Simultaneous bilateral training for improving arm function after stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Simultaneous bilateral training for improving arm function after stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006432.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fiona Coupar, Alex Pollock, Frederike van Wijck, Jacqui Morris, Peter Langhorne

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
United States 3 3%
Unknown 93 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 18%
Researcher 16 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Unspecified 7 7%
Other 36 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 38%
Unspecified 13 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 10%
Neuroscience 10 10%
Engineering 9 9%
Other 26 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,931,642
of 13,494,857 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,625
of 10,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,216
of 233,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#128
of 252 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,494,857 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 252 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.