↓ Skip to main content

Computation of Steady-State Probability Distributions in Stochastic Models of Cellular Networks

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Computation of Steady-State Probability Distributions in Stochastic Models of Cellular Networks
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, October 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002209
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark Hallen, Bochong Li, Yu Tanouchi, Cheemeng Tan, Mike West, Lingchong You

Abstract

Cellular processes are "noisy". In each cell, concentrations of molecules are subject to random fluctuations due to the small numbers of these molecules and to environmental perturbations. While noise varies with time, it is often measured at steady state, for example by flow cytometry. When interrogating aspects of a cellular network by such steady-state measurements of network components, a key need is to develop efficient methods to simulate and compute these distributions. We describe innovations in stochastic modeling coupled with approaches to this computational challenge: first, an approach to modeling intrinsic noise via solution of the chemical master equation, and second, a convolution technique to account for contributions of extrinsic noise. We show how these techniques can be combined in a streamlined procedure for evaluation of different sources of variability in a biochemical network. Evaluation and illustrations are given in analysis of two well-characterized synthetic gene circuits, as well as a signaling network underlying the mammalian cell cycle entry.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 14%
Germany 4 5%
United Kingdom 2 3%
Italy 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 54 73%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 38%
Researcher 16 22%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Professor 4 5%
Other 16 22%
Unknown 1 1%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 41%
Engineering 10 14%
Physics and Astronomy 8 11%
Mathematics 6 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 8%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 3 4%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2011.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#8,567
of 8,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,645
of 148,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#113
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.