↓ Skip to main content

Nutritional adequacy of dietary intake in women with anorexia nervosa.

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrients, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Nutritional adequacy of dietary intake in women with anorexia nervosa.
Published in
Nutrients, May 2015
DOI 10.3390/nu7053652
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raatz, Susan K, Jahns, Lisa, Johnson, LuAnn K, Crosby, Ross, Mitchell, James E, Crow, Scott, Peterson, Carol, Le Grange, Daniel, Wonderlich, Stephen A, Susan Raatz, Lisa Jahns, LuAnn Johnson, Ross Crosby, James Mitchell, Scott Crow, Carol Peterson, Daniel Le Grange, Stephen Wonderlich

Abstract

Understanding nutrient intake of anorexia nervosa (AN) patients is essential for the treatment. Therefore, estimates of total energy and nutrient consumption were made in a group of young women (19 to 30 years) with restricting and binge purge subtypes of AN participating in an ecological momentary assessment study. Participants completed three nonconsecutive 24-hour diet recalls. Mean nutrient intakes were stratified by subtype and by quartiles of energy intake and compared to the age specific Dietary Reference Intake (DRI) levels, as well as to the reported intakes from the What We Eat In America (WWEIA) dietary survey 2011-2012. Reported intake was determined for energy, macronutrients, and micronutrients. The mean body mass index (BMI) for all participants was 17.2 ± 0.1 kg/m2. Reported nutrient intake was insufficient for participants in quartiles 1-3 of both AN subtypes when compared to the DRIs. Intake reported by participants in quartile 4 of both subgroups met requirements for most nutrients and even met or exceeded estimated energy needs. Counseling of AN patients should be directed to total food consumption to improve energy intake and to reduce individual nutritional gaps.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 4%
Unknown 24 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 24%
Researcher 5 20%
Professor 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Other 6 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 12%
Social Sciences 3 12%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 3 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2017.
All research outputs
#1,707,829
of 8,276,988 outputs
Outputs from Nutrients
#1,012
of 2,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,358
of 220,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrients
#45
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,276,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,619 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.