You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Multivariate probabilistic projections using imperfect climate models part I: outline of methodology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Climate Dynamics, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00382-011-1208-9 |
| Authors |
David M. H. Sexton, James M. Murphy, Mat Collins, Mark J. Webb |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 103 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 41 | 38% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 7% |
| Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 19 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 44 | 41% |
| Environmental Science | 20 | 19% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 6 | 6% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Mathematics | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 24 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2014.
All research outputs
#4,174,441
of 22,807,037 outputs
Outputs from Climate Dynamics
#1,524
of 4,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,736
of 239,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climate Dynamics
#11
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,807,037 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,912 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.