↓ Skip to main content

The Brain's Router: A Cortical Network Model of Serial Processing in the Primate Brain

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
72 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
341 Mendeley
citeulike
15 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Brain's Router: A Cortical Network Model of Serial Processing in the Primate Brain
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, April 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000765
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ariel Zylberberg, Diego Fernández Slezak, Pieter R. Roelfsema, Stanislas Dehaene, Mariano Sigman

Abstract

The human brain efficiently solves certain operations such as object recognition and categorization through a massively parallel network of dedicated processors. However, human cognition also relies on the ability to perform an arbitrarily large set of tasks by flexibly recombining different processors into a novel chain. This flexibility comes at the cost of a severe slowing down and a seriality of operations (100-500 ms per step). A limit on parallel processing is demonstrated in experimental setups such as the psychological refractory period (PRP) and the attentional blink (AB) in which the processing of an element either significantly delays (PRP) or impedes conscious access (AB) of a second, rapidly presented element. Here we present a spiking-neuron implementation of a cognitive architecture where a large number of local parallel processors assemble together to produce goal-driven behavior. The precise mapping of incoming sensory stimuli onto motor representations relies on a "router" network capable of flexibly interconnecting processors and rapidly changing its configuration from one task to another. Simulations show that, when presented with dual-task stimuli, the network exhibits parallel processing at peripheral sensory levels, a memory buffer capable of keeping the result of sensory processing on hold, and a slow serial performance at the router stage, resulting in a performance bottleneck. The network captures the detailed dynamics of human behavior during dual-task-performance, including both mean RTs and RT distributions, and establishes concrete predictions on neuronal dynamics during dual-task experiments in humans and non-human primates.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 72 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 341 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 12 4%
United Kingdom 9 3%
Germany 8 2%
Canada 6 2%
Netherlands 5 1%
France 4 1%
Brazil 4 1%
Italy 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Other 8 2%
Unknown 281 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 102 30%
Researcher 66 19%
Student > Master 30 9%
Student > Bachelor 30 9%
Professor 28 8%
Other 59 17%
Unknown 26 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 72 21%
Psychology 69 20%
Neuroscience 52 15%
Computer Science 46 13%
Physics and Astronomy 17 5%
Other 47 14%
Unknown 38 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2020.
All research outputs
#988,707
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#747
of 9,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,870
of 105,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#2
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.