You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A pair of new BAC and BIBAC vectors that facilitate BAC/BIBAC library construction and intact large genomic DNA insert exchange
|
---|---|
Published in |
Plant Methods, October 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1746-4811-7-33 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xue Shi, Haiyang Zeng, Yadong Xue, Meizhong Luo |
Abstract |
Large-insert BAC and BIBAC libraries are important tools for structural and functional genomics studies of eukaryotic genomes. To facilitate the construction of BAC and BIBAC libraries and the transfer of complete large BAC inserts into BIBAC vectors, which is desired in positional cloning, we developed a pair of new BAC and BIBAC vectors. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Philippines | 1 | 3% |
Germany | 1 | 3% |
Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 35 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 11 | 29% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 21% |
Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
Professor | 3 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
Other | 7 | 18% |
Unknown | 3 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 76% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
Philosophy | 1 | 3% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2016.
All research outputs
#6,375,151
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#401
of 1,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,256
of 135,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,065 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.