↓ Skip to main content

When Does Reward Maximization Lead to Matching Law?

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
When Does Reward Maximization Lead to Matching Law?
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0003795
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yutaka Sakai, Tomoki Fukai

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 2%
Switzerland 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
India 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 80 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 35%
Researcher 13 15%
Professor 13 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 9%
Student > Master 5 6%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 8 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 28 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 19%
Neuroscience 12 13%
Computer Science 9 10%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 6 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2021.
All research outputs
#16,161,035
of 25,542,788 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#143,673
of 222,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,710
of 179,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#388
of 463 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,542,788 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 222,671 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 463 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.