You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
When Does Reward Maximization Lead to Matching Law?
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2008
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0003795 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yutaka Sakai, Tomoki Fukai |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 2 | 2% |
Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Portugal | 1 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
India | 1 | 1% |
Belgium | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 80 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 35% |
Researcher | 13 | 15% |
Professor | 13 | 15% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 9% |
Student > Master | 5 | 6% |
Other | 11 | 12% |
Unknown | 8 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 28 | 31% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 19% |
Neuroscience | 12 | 13% |
Computer Science | 9 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
Other | 13 | 15% |
Unknown | 6 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2021.
All research outputs
#16,161,035
of 25,542,788 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#143,673
of 222,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,710
of 179,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#388
of 463 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,542,788 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 222,671 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 463 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.