↓ Skip to main content

Adjuvant chemotherapy for endometrial cancer after hysterectomy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adjuvant chemotherapy for endometrial cancer after hysterectomy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003175.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nick Johnson, Andrew Bryant, Tracie Miles, Thomas Hogberg, Paul Cornes

Abstract

Endometrial adenocarcinoma (womb cancer) is a malignant growth of the lining (endometrium) of the womb (uterus). It is distinct from sarcomas (tumours of the uterine muscle). Survival depends the risk of microscopic metastases after surgery. Adjuvant (postoperative) chemotherapy improves survival from some other adenocarcinomas, and there is evidence that endometrial cancer is sensitive to cytotoxic therapy. This systematic review examines the effect of chemotherapy on survival after hysterectomy for endometrial cancer.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 99 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 25%
Student > Bachelor 15 14%
Unspecified 13 13%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Other 28 27%
Unknown 1 <1%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 55%
Unspecified 15 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 1 <1%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2014.
All research outputs
#3,053,268
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,210
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,506
of 96,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#37
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.