You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Impact of Boundary Spanning Scholarly Publications and Patents
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, August 2009
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0006547 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xiaolin Shi, Lada A. Adamic, Belle L. Tseng, Gavin S. Clarkson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 69 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 21 | 30% |
United Kingdom | 9 | 13% |
Spain | 3 | 4% |
Ireland | 2 | 3% |
Germany | 2 | 3% |
Indonesia | 1 | 1% |
Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
Portugal | 1 | 1% |
Italy | 1 | 1% |
Other | 3 | 4% |
Unknown | 25 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 33 | 48% |
Members of the public | 30 | 43% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 4% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Sweden | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Colombia | 1 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
Russia | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 66 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 35% |
Researcher | 9 | 12% |
Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 4 | 5% |
Other | 13 | 17% |
Unknown | 11 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 15 | 19% |
Computer Science | 10 | 13% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 10% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 8% |
Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 6% |
Other | 17 | 22% |
Unknown | 16 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2020.
All research outputs
#868,333
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#11,346
of 224,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,317
of 119,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#32
of 515 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,806 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 515 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.