↓ Skip to main content

Transcriptional regulator PRDM12 is essential for human pain perception

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Genetics, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 4,592)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Transcriptional regulator PRDM12 is essential for human pain perception
Published in
Nature Genetics, May 2015
DOI 10.1038/ng.3308
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ya-Chun Chen, Michaela Auer-Grumbach, Shinya Matsukawa, Manuela Zitzelsberger, Andreas C Themistocleous, Tim M Strom, Chrysanthi Samara, Adrian W Moore, Lily Ting-Yin Cho, Gareth T Young, Caecilia Weiss, Maria Schabhüttl, Rolf Stucka, Annina B Schmid, Yesim Parman, Luitgard Graul-Neumann, Wolfram Heinritz, Eberhard Passarge, Rosemarie M Watson, Jens Michael Hertz, Ute Moog, Manuela Baumgartner, Enza Maria Valente, Diego Pereira, Carlos M Restrepo, Istvan Katona, Marina Dusl, Claudia Stendel, Thomas Wieland, Fay Stafford, Frank Reimann, Katja von Au, Christian Finke, Patrick J Willems, Michael S Nahorski, Samiha S Shaikh, Ofélia P Carvalho, Adeline K Nicholas, Gulshan Karbani, Maeve A McAleer, Maria Roberta Cilio, John C McHugh, Sinead M Murphy, Alan D Irvine, Uffe Birk Jensen, Reinhard Windhager, Joachim Weis, Carsten Bergmann, Bernd Rautenstrauss, Jonathan Baets, Peter De Jonghe, Mary M Reilly, Regina Kropatsch, Ingo Kurth, Roman Chrast, Tatsuo Michiue, David L H Bennett, C Geoffrey Woods, Jan Senderek, Chen, Ya-Chun, Auer-Grumbach, Michaela, Matsukawa, Shinya, Zitzelsberger, Manuela, Themistocleous, Andreas C, Strom, Tim M, Samara, Chrysanthi, Moore, Adrian W, Cho, Lily Ting-Yin, Young, Gareth T, Weiss, Caecilia, Schabhüttl, Maria, Stucka, Rolf, Schmid, Annina B, Parman, Yesim, Graul-Neumann, Luitgard, Heinritz, Wolfram, Passarge, Eberhard, Watson, Rosemarie M, Hertz, Jens Michael, Moog, Ute, Baumgartner, Manuela, Valente, Enza Maria, Pereira, Diego, Restrepo, Carlos M, Katona, Istvan, Dusl, Marina, Stendel, Claudia, Wieland, Thomas, Stafford, Fay, Reimann, Frank, von Au, Katja, Finke, Christian, Willems, Patrick J, Nahorski, Michael S, Shaikh, Samiha S, Carvalho, Ofélia P, Nicholas, Adeline K, Karbani, Gulshan, McAleer, Maeve A, Cilio, Maria Roberta, McHugh, John C, Murphy, Sinead M, Irvine, Alan D, Jensen, Uffe Birk, Windhager, Reinhard, Weis, Joachim, Bergmann, Carsten, Rautenstrauss, Bernd, Baets, Jonathan, De Jonghe, Peter, Reilly, Mary M, Kropatsch, Regina, Kurth, Ingo, Chrast, Roman, Michiue, Tatsuo, Bennett, David L H, Woods, C Geoffrey, Senderek, Jan

Abstract

Pain perception has evolved as a warning mechanism to alert organisms to tissue damage and dangerous environments. In humans, however, undesirable, excessive or chronic pain is a common and major societal burden for which available medical treatments are currently suboptimal. New therapeutic options have recently been derived from studies of individuals with congenital insensitivity to pain (CIP). Here we identified 10 different homozygous mutations in PRDM12 (encoding PRDI-BF1 and RIZ homology domain-containing protein 12) in subjects with CIP from 11 families. Prdm proteins are a family of epigenetic regulators that control neural specification and neurogenesis. We determined that Prdm12 is expressed in nociceptors and their progenitors and participates in the development of sensory neurons in Xenopus embryos. Moreover, CIP-associated mutants abrogate the histone-modifying potential associated with wild-type Prdm12. Prdm12 emerges as a key factor in the orchestration of sensory neurogenesis and may hold promise as a target for new pain therapeutics.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 101 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 103 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 28%
Researcher 21 19%
Student > Master 12 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 9%
Other 8 7%
Other 28 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 14%
Neuroscience 11 10%
Unspecified 8 7%
Other 11 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 382. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,148
of 8,496,223 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#26
of 4,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#470
of 221,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#2
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,496,223 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,592 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.