You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Avoiding Toxic Levels of Essential Minerals: A Forgotten Factor in Deer Diet Preferences
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0115814 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Francisco Ceacero, Tomás Landete-Castillejos, Augusto Olguín, María Miranda, Andrés García, Alberto Martínez, Jorge Cassinello, Valentín Miguel, Laureano Gallego |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Portugal | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 34 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 19% |
| Researcher | 6 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 36% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 19% |
| Unknown | 6 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2015.
All research outputs
#4,106,293
of 22,807,037 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#58,548
of 194,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,970
of 351,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#620
of 3,006 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,807,037 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,006 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.