↓ Skip to main content

Pressure distribution analysis in three wheelchairs cushions of subjects with spinal cord injury

Overview of attention for article published in Disability & Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pressure distribution analysis in three wheelchairs cushions of subjects with spinal cord injury
Published in
Disability & Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, April 2018
DOI 10.1080/17483107.2018.1463399
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paulo Vinicius Braga Mendes, Luma Carolina Câmara Gradim, Natália Sanches Silva, Ana Luiza Caltabiano Allegretti, Débora Couto De Melo Carrijo, Daniel Marinho Cezar da Cruz

Abstract

Pressure injuries are a complication due to spinal cord injury. The objective of the study is to compare the pressure distribution in the wheelchair seat of subjects with spinal cord injury using 3 pads (Roho®, Varilite® and Varilite®). Pressure analysis was performed on 10 participants in two situations: (a) the participant sitting in static posture and (b) with the wheelchair being used for locomotion. In the static position: Jay® showed the best rates for average pressure and also the contact area, the Roho® had the lowest average for the peak pressure. During the wheelchair moving, Jay® showed the best average pressure, Roho® had a lower average for peak pressure and Varilite® provided a highest means for the contact area of the buttocks and thighs. The use of appropriate cushion is an effective measure in people with spinal cord injury. Implications for Rehabilitation Pressure injuries are a complication due to spinal cord injury. Study to compare the pressure distribution in the wheelchair seat of subjects with spinal cord injury is important to minimize the injuries resulting from pressure injuries. The comfort resulting from the use of the cushion suited to the demands of the subjects with spinal cord injury is fundamental for the process of rehabilitation and social participation of the people affected. Understanding and minimizing pressure points can contribute to the appropriate rehabilitation process.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Researcher 4 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 31 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 11 15%
Engineering 9 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 11%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 1%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 36 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2018.
All research outputs
#7,359,319
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Disability & Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology
#246
of 824 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,496
of 340,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Disability & Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology
#13
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 824 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.