↓ Skip to main content

Achieving human and machine accessibility of cited data in scholarly publications

Overview of attention for article published in PeerJ Computer Science, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
4 blogs
twitter
110 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Achieving human and machine accessibility of cited data in scholarly publications
Published in
PeerJ Computer Science, May 2015
DOI 10.7717/peerj-cs.1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joan Starr, Eleni Castro, Mercè Crosas, Michel Dumontier, Robert R. Downs, Ruth Duerr, Laurel L. Haak, Melissa Haendel, Ivan Herman, Simon Hodson, Joe Hourclé, John Ernest Kratz, Jennifer Lin, Lars Holm Nielsen, Amy Nurnberger, Stefan Proell, Andreas Rauber, Simone Sacchi, Arthur Smith, Mike Taylor, Tim Clark

Abstract

Reproducibility and reusability of research results is an important concern in scientific communication and science policy. A foundational element of reproducibility and reusability is the open and persistently available presentation of research data. However, many common approaches for primary data publication in use today do not achieve sufficient long-term robustness, openness, accessibility or uniformity. Nor do they permit comprehensive exploitation by modern Web technologies. This has led to several authoritative studies recommending uniform direct citation of data archived in persistent repositories. Data are to be considered as first-class scholarly objects, and treated similarly in many ways to cited and archived scientific and scholarly literature. Here we briefly review the most current and widely agreed set of principle-based recommendations for scholarly data citation, the Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (JDDCP). We then present a framework for operationalizing the JDDCP; and a set of initial recommendations on identifier schemes, identifier resolution behavior, required metadata elements, and best practices for realizing programmatic machine actionability of cited data. The main target audience for the common implementation guidelines in this article consists of publishers, scholarly organizations, and persistent data repositories, including technical staff members in these organizations. But ordinary researchers can also benefit from these recommendations. The guidance provided here is intended to help achieve widespread, uniform human and machine accessibility of deposited data, in support of significantly improved verification, validation, reproducibility and re-use of scholarly/scientific data.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 110 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 2%
United States 3 2%
Netherlands 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Bulgaria 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 165 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 39 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 17%
Student > Master 22 12%
Other 20 11%
Librarian 15 8%
Other 36 20%
Unknown 20 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 57 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 14%
Social Sciences 16 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 5%
Environmental Science 8 4%
Other 40 22%
Unknown 27 15%