You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Right Lower Quadrant Pain—Suspected Appendicitis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ultrasound quarterly, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1097/ruq.0000000000000118 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin P. Smith, Douglas S. Katz, Tasneem Lalani, Laura R. Carucci, Brooks D. Cash, David H. Kim, Robert J. Piorkowski, William C. Small, Stephanie E. Spottswood, Mark Tulchinsky, Vahid Yaghmai, Judy Yee, Max P. Rosen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 179 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 13% |
| Researcher | 21 | 12% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 46 | 26% |
| Unknown | 41 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 105 | 58% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Unknown | 53 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2015.
All research outputs
#20,356,726
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Ultrasound quarterly
#330
of 978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,804
of 284,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ultrasound quarterly
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 978 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.