↓ Skip to main content

Parasite prevalence in fecal samples from shelter dogs and cats across the Canadian provinces

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Parasite prevalence in fecal samples from shelter dogs and cats across the Canadian provinces
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, May 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13071-015-0870-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alain Villeneuve, Lydden Polley, Emily Jenkins, Janna Schurer, John Gilleard, Susan Kutz, Gary Conboy, Donald Benoit, Wolfgang Seewald, France Gagné

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 121 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 13%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Researcher 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 21 17%
Unknown 42 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 36 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 49 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2015.
All research outputs
#16,363,465
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#3,001
of 6,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,710
of 284,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#55
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,075 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.