↓ Skip to main content

Radiogenomic Mapping of Edema/Cellular Invasion MRI-Phenotypes in Glioblastoma Multiforme

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
251 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
252 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Radiogenomic Mapping of Edema/Cellular Invasion MRI-Phenotypes in Glioblastoma Multiforme
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0025451
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pascal O. Zinn, Bhanu Majadan, Pratheesh Sathyan, Sanjay K. Singh, Sadhan Majumder, Ferenc A. Jolesz, Rivka R. Colen

Abstract

Despite recent discoveries of new molecular targets and pathways, the search for an effective therapy for Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) continues. A newly emerged field, radiogenomics, links gene expression profiles with MRI phenotypes. MRI-FLAIR is a noninvasive diagnostic modality and was previously found to correlate with cellular invasion in GBM. Thus, our radiogenomic screen has the potential to reveal novel molecular determinants of invasion. Here, we present the first comprehensive radiogenomic analysis using quantitative MRI volumetrics and large-scale gene- and microRNA expression profiling in GBM.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 3%
Colombia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 239 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 50 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 9%
Student > Master 21 8%
Other 17 7%
Other 59 23%
Unknown 34 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 30%
Computer Science 36 14%
Engineering 22 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 6%
Other 37 15%
Unknown 46 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2023.
All research outputs
#4,142,467
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#58,493
of 193,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,331
of 132,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#563
of 2,614 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,422 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,614 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.