You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Haemoglobin concentration and volume of intravenous fluids in septic shock in the ARISE trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-018-2029-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew J. Maiden, Mark E. Finnis, Sandra Peake, Simon McRae, Anthony Delaney, Michael Bailey, Rinaldo Bellomo |
| Abstract |
Intravenous fluids may contribute to lower haemoglobin levels in patients with septic shock. We sought to determine the relationship between the changes in haemoglobin concentration and the volume of intravenous fluids administered during resuscitation from septic shock. We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients enrolled in the Australasian Resuscitation in Sepsis Evaluation (ARISE) trial who were not transfused red blood cells (N = 1275). We determined the relationship between haemoglobin concentration, its change over time and volume of intravenous fluids administered over 6, 24 and 72 h using univariate and multivariate analysis. Median (IQR) haemoglobin concentration at baseline was 133 (118-146) g/L and decreased to 115 (102-127) g/L within the first 6 h of resuscitation (P < 0.001), 110 (99-122) g/L after 24 h, and 109 (97-121) g/L after 72 h. At the corresponding time points, the cumulative volume of intravenous fluid administered was 1.3 (0.7-2.2) L, 2.9 (1.8-4.3) L and 4.6 (2.7-7.1) L. Haemoglobin concentration and its change from baseline had an independent but weak association with intravenous fluid volume at each time point (R2 < 20%, P < 0.001). After adjusting for covariates, each litre of intravenous fluid administered was associated with a change in haemoglobin concentration of - 1.0 g/L (95% CI -1.5 to -0.6, P < 0.001) at 24 h and - 1.3 g/L (- 1.6 to - 0.9, P < 0.001) at 72 h. Haemoglobin concentration decreases during resuscitation from septic shock, and has a significant but weak association with the volume of intravenous fluids administered. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 238 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 42 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 33 | 14% |
| Mexico | 14 | 6% |
| Spain | 8 | 3% |
| Colombia | 5 | 2% |
| Australia | 5 | 2% |
| Canada | 5 | 2% |
| Belgium | 4 | 2% |
| Chile | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 38 | 16% |
| Unknown | 80 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 155 | 65% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 52 | 22% |
| Scientists | 25 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Researcher | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 22% |
| Unknown | 14 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 53% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 17 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 145. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2019.
All research outputs
#291,246
of 25,773,273 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#140
of 6,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,449
of 340,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#5
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,773,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,618 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,064 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.