You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pediatric Post-Discharge Mortality in Resource Poor Countries: A Systematic Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0066698 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew O. Wiens, Shane Pawluk, Niranjan Kissoon, Elias Kumbakumba, J. Mark Ansermino, Joel Singer, Andrew Ndamira, Charles Larson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Niger | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 207 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 45 | 21% |
| Researcher | 25 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 43 | 20% |
| Unknown | 57 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 78 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 24 | 11% |
| Unknown | 64 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2015.
All research outputs
#13,742,483
of 22,807,037 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#111,380
of 194,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,597
of 196,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,624
of 4,713 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,807,037 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,713 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.