You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Response of Bighead Carp and Silver Carp to Repeated Water Gun Operation in an Enclosed Shallow Pond
|
---|---|
Published in |
North American Journal of Fisheries Management, May 2015
|
DOI | 10.1080/02755947.2015.1012279 |
Authors |
Jason G. Romine, Nathan R. Jensen, Michael J. Parsley, Robert F. Gaugush, Todd J. Severson, Tyson W. Hatton, Ryan F. Adams, Mark P. Gaikowski |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 9 | 38% |
Other | 5 | 21% |
Student > Master | 5 | 21% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 2 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 42% |
Environmental Science | 6 | 25% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 4% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 6 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2015.
All research outputs
#4,019,334
of 22,807,037 outputs
Outputs from North American Journal of Fisheries Management
#114
of 999 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,098
of 265,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from North American Journal of Fisheries Management
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,807,037 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 999 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.