↓ Skip to main content

II Diretriz de Ressonância Magnética e Tomografia Computadorizada Cardiovascular da Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia e do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
II Diretriz de Ressonância Magnética e Tomografia Computadorizada Cardiovascular da Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia e do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia
Published in
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, January 2014
DOI 10.5935/abc.2014s006
Pubmed ID
Authors

L Sara, G Szarf, A Tachibana, AA Shiozaki, AV Villa, AC Oliveira, AS Albuquerque, CE Rochitte, CH Nomura, CF Azevedo, D Jasinowodolinski, EM Tassi, FM Medeiros, FU Kay, FP Junqueira, GSA Azevedo, GU Monte, IMF Pinto, I Gottlieb, J Andrade, JAC Lima, JR Parga-Filho, J Kelendjian, JL Fernandes, L Iquizli, LCL Correia, LA Quaglia, LFG Gonçalves, LF Ávila, M Zapparoli, M Hadlich, MS Nacif, MM Barbosa, MH Minami, MS Bittencourt, MHA Siqueira, MC Silva, MMU Lopes, MD Marques, MLR Vieira, OR Coellho-Filho, PR Schvartzman, RD Santos, RC Cury, R Loureiro, RC Cury, R Sasdelli-Neto, R Macedo, RJ Cerci, RA Faria-Filho, S Cardoso, T Naves, TA Magalhães, T Senra, UMMC Burgos, VM Moreira, WY Ishikawa

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 3%
Portugal 1 1%
Unknown 70 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 14%
Student > Master 7 10%
Other 6 8%
Researcher 6 8%
Other 16 22%
Unknown 17 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Linguistics 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 19 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2022.
All research outputs
#15,325,004
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#442
of 1,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,164
of 305,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#29
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,074 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,417 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.