You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Characteristics of HIV-1 Serodiscordant Couples Enrolled in a Clinical Trial of Antiretroviral Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis for HIV-1 Prevention
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0025828 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew Mujugira, Jared M. Baeten, Deborah Donnell, Patrick Ndase, Nelly R. Mugo, Linda Barnes, James D. Campbell, Jonathan Wangisi, Jordan W. Tappero, Elizabeth Bukusi, Craig R. Cohen, Elly Katabira, Allan Ronald, Elioda Tumwesigye, Edwin Were, Kenneth H. Fife, James Kiarie, Carey Farquhar, Grace John-Stewart, Lara Kidoguchi, Dana Panteleeff, Meighan Krows, Heena Shah, Jennifer Revall, Susan Morrison, Lisa Ondrejcek, Charlotte Ingram, Robert W. Coombs, Jairam R. Lingappa, Connie Celum |
| Abstract |
Stable heterosexual HIV-1 serodiscordant couples in Africa have high HIV-1 transmission rates and are a critical population for evaluation of new HIV-1 prevention strategies. The Partners PrEP Study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of tenofovir and emtricitabine-tenofovir pre-exposure prophylaxis to decrease HIV-1 acquisition within heterosexual HIV-1 serodiscordant couples. We describe the trial design and characteristics of the study cohort. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 145 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 36 | 24% |
| Researcher | 22 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 30 | 20% |
| Unknown | 26 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 5% |
| Psychology | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 14% |
| Unknown | 34 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2018.
All research outputs
#3,117,716
of 22,914,829 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#41,054
of 195,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,063
of 133,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#429
of 2,615 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,914,829 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,615 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.