↓ Skip to main content

Unscented Kalman Filter for Brain-Machine Interfaces

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
168 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
267 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Unscented Kalman Filter for Brain-Machine Interfaces
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0006243
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zheng Li, Joseph E. O'Doherty, Timothy L. Hanson, Mikhail A. Lebedev, Craig S. Henriquez, Miguel A. L. Nicolelis

Abstract

Brain machine interfaces (BMIs) are devices that convert neural signals into commands to directly control artificial actuators, such as limb prostheses. Previous real-time methods applied to decoding behavioral commands from the activity of populations of neurons have generally relied upon linear models of neural tuning and were limited in the way they used the abundant statistical information contained in the movement profiles of motor tasks. Here, we propose an n-th order unscented Kalman filter which implements two key features: (1) use of a non-linear (quadratic) model of neural tuning which describes neural activity significantly better than commonly-used linear tuning models, and (2) augmentation of the movement state variables with a history of n-1 recent states, which improves prediction of the desired command even before incorporating neural activity information and allows the tuning model to capture relationships between neural activity and movement at multiple time offsets simultaneously. This new filter was tested in BMI experiments in which rhesus monkeys used their cortical activity, recorded through chronically implanted multielectrode arrays, to directly control computer cursors. The 10th order unscented Kalman filter outperformed the standard Kalman filter and the Wiener filter in both off-line reconstruction of movement trajectories and real-time, closed-loop BMI operation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 13 5%
Germany 4 1%
Japan 3 1%
Brazil 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 236 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 88 33%
Researcher 44 16%
Student > Master 33 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 6%
Professor 16 6%
Other 39 15%
Unknown 30 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 99 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 15%
Neuroscience 34 13%
Computer Science 23 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 4%
Other 25 9%
Unknown 36 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2012.
All research outputs
#4,642,093
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#63,190
of 193,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,849
of 109,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#157
of 505 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,422 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 505 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.