↓ Skip to main content

Oil and Gas Projects in the Western Amazon: Threats to Wilderness, Biodiversity, and Indigenous Peoples

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
21 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
436 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
876 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Oil and Gas Projects in the Western Amazon: Threats to Wilderness, Biodiversity, and Indigenous Peoples
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0002932
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matt Finer, Clinton N. Jenkins, Stuart L. Pimm, Brian Keane, Carl Ross

Abstract

The western Amazon is the most biologically rich part of the Amazon basin and is home to a great diversity of indigenous ethnic groups, including some of the world's last uncontacted peoples living in voluntary isolation. Unlike the eastern Brazilian Amazon, it is still a largely intact ecosystem. Underlying this landscape are large reserves of oil and gas, many yet untapped. The growing global demand is leading to unprecedented exploration and development in the region.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 876 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 17 2%
Brazil 10 1%
United Kingdom 7 <1%
Germany 5 <1%
Chile 4 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
Peru 3 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 7 <1%
Unknown 817 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 144 16%
Student > Master 135 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 130 15%
Student > Bachelor 127 14%
Other 47 5%
Other 170 19%
Unknown 123 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 256 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 230 26%
Social Sciences 79 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 32 4%
Engineering 27 3%
Other 110 13%
Unknown 142 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 86. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2022.
All research outputs
#500,572
of 25,550,333 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#6,909
of 222,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#904
of 93,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#15
of 445 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,550,333 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 222,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 445 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.