↓ Skip to main content

Endovascular Stent-Graft Repair of Spontaneous Isolated Dissection of the Superior Mesenteric Artery

Overview of attention for article published in CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Endovascular Stent-Graft Repair of Spontaneous Isolated Dissection of the Superior Mesenteric Artery
Published in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00270-018-1889-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Didi Wen, Zhankui Wang, Jing Yu, Wenlong Zhang, Xiaobin Yang, Hua He, Xuexin Zhang, Ying Lin, Rui An, Minwen Zheng, Jian Xu

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the short-term clinical outcomes, safety, and efficacy of covered stents implantation for patients with spontaneous isolated dissection of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA). Between October 2013 and December 2016, 12 patients (mean age, 50.0 ± 6.2 years; range 38-62 years) with spontaneous isolated dissection of SMA received endovascular treatment with the placement of covered stents at our institution. Patients' clinical characteristics were analyzed including sex, age, medical history, risk factors, symptoms, and diagnostic imaging modality. The technical and clinical successes of covered stents placement were retrospectively analyzed. Standard follow-up protocol included abdominal computed tomography angiography and clinical examinations at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and annually thereafter to confirm patients' general condition. All dissections were located at the anterior wall and around the convex curvature of SMA. The mean length of the SMA dissection was 37.8 ± 31.5 mm (range 6.9-105.0 cm). Immediate technical success was defined as normal blood flow in the SMA and no contrast medium in the false lumen achieved in all patients. The mean duration of follow-up was 26.9 ± 7.2 months (range 16-36 months). Abdominal CT angiography demonstrated that no patients experienced endoleak or stent stenosis during follow-up. For symptomatic spontaneous isolated dissection of SMA in patients without aneurysms rupture and bowel necrosis, endovascular treatment with covered stents may be a safe and effective treatment option with a good short-term outcome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Librarian 1 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 3 19%
Unknown 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 50%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Unknown 6 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2022.
All research outputs
#14,765,088
of 25,145,981 outputs
Outputs from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#1,293
of 2,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,536
of 451,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#27
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,145,981 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,691 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.