You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Misdiagnosis of Earth climate sensitivity based on energy balance model results
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science Bulletin, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11434-015-0806-z |
| Authors |
Mark Richardson, Zeke Hausfather, Dana A. Nuccitelli, Ken Rice, John P. Abraham |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 30% |
| Canada | 5 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 11% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 18 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 62% |
| Scientists | 13 | 28% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 19 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 8 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 25% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 5% |
| Psychology | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 15% |
| Unknown | 8 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 98. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2023.
All research outputs
#438,615
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Science Bulletin
#21
of 1,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,819
of 277,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Bulletin
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,828 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.