↓ Skip to main content

Tracking sharks without teeth: a non-invasive rigid tag attachment for large predatory sharks

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Biotelemetry, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 147)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
26 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tracking sharks without teeth: a non-invasive rigid tag attachment for large predatory sharks
Published in
Animal Biotelemetry, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40317-015-0044-9
Authors

Taylor K. Chapple, Adrian C. Gleiss, Oliver J. D. Jewell, Martin Wikelski, Barbara A. Block

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 82 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 21%
Student > Master 18 21%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Other 4 5%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 7 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 62%
Environmental Science 13 15%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 4%
Philosophy 2 2%
Physics and Astronomy 2 2%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 8 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2019.
All research outputs
#606,349
of 14,546,774 outputs
Outputs from Animal Biotelemetry
#19
of 147 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,344
of 234,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Biotelemetry
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,546,774 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 147 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them