↓ Skip to main content

Temporal and spatial trends of PCBs, DDTs, HCHs, and HCB in Swedish marine biota 1969–2012

Overview of attention for article published in Ambio, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Temporal and spatial trends of PCBs, DDTs, HCHs, and HCB in Swedish marine biota 1969–2012
Published in
Ambio, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13280-015-0673-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elisabeth Nyberg, Suzanne Faxneld, Sara Danielsson, Ulla Eriksson, Aroha Miller, Anders Bignert

Abstract

In the 1960s, the Baltic Sea was severely polluted by organic contaminants such as PCBs, HCHs, HCB, and DDTs. Elevated concentrations caused severe adverse effects in Baltic biota. Since then, these substances have been monitored temporally and spatially in Baltic biota, primarily in herring (Clupea harengus) and in guillemot (Uria aalge) egg, but also in cod (Gadus morhua), perch (Perca fluviatilis), eelpout (Zoarces viviparous), and blue mussel (Mytilus edulis). These chemicals were banned in Sweden in the late 1970s/early 1980s. Since the start of monitoring, overall significant decreases of about 70-90 % have been observed. However, concentrations are still higher in the Baltic Sea than in, for example, the North Sea. CB-118 and DDE exceed the suggested target concentrations (24 µg kg(-1) lipid weight and 5 µg kg(-1) wet weight, respectively) at certain sites in some of the monitored species, showing that concentrations may still be too high to protect the most sensitive organisms.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Norway 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 38 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 19%
Researcher 8 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Student > Master 4 9%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 7 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 13 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 30%
Chemistry 3 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 11 26%