↓ Skip to main content

Clinical consultations in an Aboriginal community-controlled health service: a comparison with general practice

Overview of attention for article published in Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, January 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical consultations in an Aboriginal community-controlled health service: a comparison with general practice
Published in
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, January 1998
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-842x.1998.tb01150.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

David P. Thomas, Richard F. Heller, Jennifer M. Hunt

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 3 6%
Germany 2 4%
Canada 1 2%
New Zealand 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Unknown 40 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 23%
Student > Bachelor 7 15%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 8 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 35%
Social Sciences 6 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Psychology 4 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 11 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
#1,065
of 1,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,751
of 94,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,909 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.