You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Climate Change and Trophic Response of the Antarctic Bottom Fauna
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0004385 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard B. Aronson, Ryan M. Moody, Linda C. Ivany, Daniel B. Blake, John E. Werner, Alexander Glass |
| Abstract |
As Earth warms, temperate and subpolar marine species will increasingly shift their geographic ranges poleward. The endemic shelf fauna of Antarctica is especially vulnerable to climate-mediated biological invasions because cold temperatures currently exclude the durophagous (shell-breaking) predators that structure shallow-benthic communities elsewhere. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Belgium | 2 | 1% |
| Argentina | 2 | 1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 150 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 46 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 9% |
| Professor | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 14% |
| Unknown | 24 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 72 | 41% |
| Environmental Science | 30 | 17% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 30 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Unknown | 28 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2011.
All research outputs
#2,897,078
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#38,513
of 193,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,769
of 169,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#132
of 534 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,422 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,797 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 534 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.