You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
International chemical identifier for reactions (RInChI)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Cheminformatics, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13321-018-0277-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Guenter Grethe, Gerd Blanke, Hans Kraut, Jonathan M. Goodman |
| Abstract |
The Reaction InChI (RInChI) extends the idea of the InChI, which provides a unique descriptor of molecular structures, towards reactions. Prototype versions of the RInChI have been available since 2011. The first official release (RInChI-V1.00), funded by the InChI Trust, is now available for download ( http://www.inchi-trust.org/downloads/ ). This release defines the format and generates hashed representations (RInChIKeys) suitable for database and web operations. The RInChI provides a concise description of the key data in chemical processes, and facilitates the manipulation and analysis of reaction data. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 14% |
| France | 3 | 7% |
| Japan | 3 | 7% |
| Sweden | 3 | 7% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| China | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Russia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 17 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 48% |
| Scientists | 19 | 43% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Bulgaria | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 67 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 13 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 28 | 41% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 13% |
| Chemical Engineering | 4 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 16 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,115,835
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cheminformatics
#37
of 981 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,961
of 342,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cheminformatics
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 981 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,123 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.