↓ Skip to main content

The brain, self and society: a social-neuroscience model of predictive processing

Overview of attention for article published in Social Neuroscience, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The brain, self and society: a social-neuroscience model of predictive processing
Published in
Social Neuroscience, May 2018
DOI 10.1080/17470919.2018.1471003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael P Kelly, Natasha M. Kriznik, Ann Louise Kinmonth, Paul C. Fletcher

Abstract

This paper presents a hypothesis about how social interactions shape and influence predictive processing in the brain. The paper integrates concepts from neuroscience and sociology where a gulf presently exists between the ways that each describe the same phenomenon - how the social world is engaged with by thinking humans. We combine the concepts of predictive processing models (also called predictive coding models in the neuroscience literature) with ideal types, typifications and social practice - concepts from the sociological literature. This generates a unified hypothetical framework integrating the social world and hypothesised brain processes. The hypothesis combines aspects of neuroscience and psychology with social theory to show how social behaviors may be "mapped" onto brain processes. It outlines a conceptual framework that connects the two disciplines and that may enable creative dialogue and potential future research.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 72 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 24%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Master 6 8%
Other 5 7%
Other 15 21%
Unknown 11 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 16 22%
Psychology 16 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 7%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Unspecified 3 4%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 16 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,635,261
of 16,125,596 outputs
Outputs from Social Neuroscience
#105
of 520 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,724
of 280,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Neuroscience
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,125,596 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 520 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,945 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.