You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Antiquity and Evolutionary History of Social Behavior in Bees
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0021086 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sophie Cardinal, Bryan N. Danforth |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| Panama | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 359 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 342 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 75 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 62 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 50 | 14% |
| Researcher | 33 | 9% |
| Professor | 17 | 5% |
| Other | 56 | 16% |
| Unknown | 66 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 212 | 59% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 30 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 19 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 1% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 15 | 4% |
| Unknown | 74 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2024.
All research outputs
#6,968,641
of 25,489,496 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#97,255
of 222,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,413
of 126,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#724
of 1,952 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,489,496 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 222,145 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,952 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.