You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Marine Biodiversity in the Atlantic and Pacific Coasts of South America: Knowledge and Gaps
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0014631 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patricia Miloslavich, Eduardo Klein, Juan M. Díaz, Cristián E. Hernández, Gregorio Bigatti, Lucia Campos, Felipe Artigas, Julio Castillo, Pablo E. Penchaszadeh, Paula E. Neill, Alvar Carranza, María V. Retana, Juan M. Díaz de Astarloa, Mirtha Lewis, Pablo Yorio, María L. Piriz, Diego Rodríguez, Yocie Yoneshigue-Valentin, Luiz Gamboa, Alberto Martín |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 724 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 25 | 3% |
| Argentina | 4 | <1% |
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Chile | 4 | <1% |
| Mexico | 3 | <1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 1% |
| Unknown | 665 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 133 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 113 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 109 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 74 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 41 | 6% |
| Other | 145 | 20% |
| Unknown | 109 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 336 | 46% |
| Environmental Science | 124 | 17% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 56 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 2% |
| Engineering | 11 | 2% |
| Other | 52 | 7% |
| Unknown | 128 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2016.
All research outputs
#5,587,386
of 25,866,425 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#91,793
of 225,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,172
of 196,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#418
of 1,292 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,866,425 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,574 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,292 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.