↓ Skip to main content

TreeShrink: fast and accurate detection of outlier long branches in collections of phylogenetic trees

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
28 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
242 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
TreeShrink: fast and accurate detection of outlier long branches in collections of phylogenetic trees
Published in
BMC Genomics, May 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12864-018-4620-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Uyen Mai, Siavash Mirarab

Abstract

Sequence data used in reconstructing phylogenetic trees may include various sources of error. Typically errors are detected at the sequence level, but when missed, the erroneous sequences often appear as unexpectedly long branches in the inferred phylogeny. We propose an automatic method to detect such errors. We build a phylogeny including all the data then detect sequences that artificially inflate the tree diameter. We formulate an optimization problem, called the k-shrink problem, that seeks to find k leaves that could be removed to maximally reduce the tree diameter. We present an algorithm to find the exact solution for this problem in polynomial time. We then use several statistical tests to find outlier species that have an unexpectedly high impact on the tree diameter. These tests can use a single tree or a set of related gene trees and can also adjust to species-specific patterns of branch length. The resulting method is called TreeShrink. We test our method on six phylogenomic biological datasets and an HIV dataset and show that the method successfully detects and removes long branches. TreeShrink removes sequences more conservatively than rogue taxon removal and often reduces gene tree discordance more than rogue taxon removal once the amount of filtering is controlled. TreeShrink is an effective method for detecting sequences that lead to unrealistically long branch lengths in phylogenetic trees. The tool is publicly available at https://github.com/uym2/TreeShrink .

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 159 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 25%
Researcher 17 11%
Student > Master 15 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 42 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 41 26%
Computer Science 6 4%
Environmental Science 5 3%
Engineering 2 1%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 48 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,747,687
of 25,859,234 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#345
of 11,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,004
of 343,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#11
of 249 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,859,234 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,349 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 249 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.