↓ Skip to main content

Making randomised trials more efficient: report of the first meeting to discuss the Trial Forge platform

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
4 blogs
twitter
76 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Making randomised trials more efficient: report of the first meeting to discuss the Trial Forge platform
Published in
Trials, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13063-015-0776-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shaun Treweek, Doug G. Altman, Peter Bower, Marion Campbell, Iain Chalmers, Seonaidh Cotton, Peter Craig, David Crosby, Peter Davidson, Declan Devane, Lelia Duley, Janet Dunn, Diana Elbourne, Barbara Farrell, Carrol Gamble, Katie Gillies, Kerry Hood, Trudie Lang, Roberta Littleford, Kirsty Loudon, Alison McDonald, Gladys McPherson, Annmarie Nelson, John Norrie, Craig Ramsay, Peter Sandercock, Daniel R Shanahan, William Summerskill, Matt Sydes, Paula Williamson, Mike Clarke

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 76 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Russia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 134 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 19%
Student > Master 22 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 11%
Other 12 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Other 24 17%
Unknown 28 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 13%
Social Sciences 10 7%
Psychology 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 31 22%