↓ Skip to main content

From Preferred to Actual Mate Characteristics: The Case of Human Body Shape

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
27 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
From Preferred to Actual Mate Characteristics: The Case of Human Body Shape
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0013010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandre Courtiol, Sandrine Picq, Bernard Godelle, Michel Raymond, Jean-Baptiste Ferdy

Abstract

The way individuals pair to produce reproductive units is a major factor determining evolution. This process is complex because it is determined not only by individual mating preferences, but also by numerous other factors such as competition between mates. Consequently, preferred and actual characteristics of mates obtained should differ, but this has rarely been addressed. We simultaneously measured mating preferences for stature, body mass, and body mass index, and recorded corresponding actual partner's characteristics for 116 human couples from France. Results show that preferred and actual partner's characteristics differ for male judges, but not for females. In addition, while the correlation between all preferred and actual partner's characteristics appeared to be weak for female judges, it was strong for males: while men prefer women slimmer than their actual partner, those who prefer the slimmest women also have partners who are slimmer than average. This study therefore suggests that the influences of preferences on pair formation can be sex-specific. It also illustrates that this process can lead to unexpected results on the real influences of mating preferences: traits considered as highly influencing attractiveness do not necessarily have a strong influence on the actual pairing, the reverse being also possible.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Czechia 4 5%
United Kingdom 3 3%
United States 3 3%
Netherlands 2 2%
Switzerland 2 2%
New Zealand 1 1%
Hungary 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Romania 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 69 79%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 20%
Student > Master 17 20%
Researcher 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Other 7 8%
Other 21 24%
Unknown 2 2%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 30 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 34%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Sports and Recreations 4 5%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 5 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2024.
All research outputs
#542,531
of 25,795,662 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#7,437
of 224,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,444
of 108,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#35
of 939 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,795,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,881 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,727 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 939 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.