↓ Skip to main content

Prediction of the effects of cone tip diameter on the cyclone performance

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Aerosol Science, August 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prediction of the effects of cone tip diameter on the cyclone performance
Published in
Journal of Aerosol Science, August 2005
DOI 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.10.014
Authors

Jolius Gimbun, T.G. Chuah, Thomas S.Y. Choong, A. Fakhru’l-Razi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Unknown 61 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 16%
Researcher 9 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Other 15 23%
Unknown 14 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 28 44%
Chemical Engineering 6 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Energy 3 5%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 17 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2015.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Aerosol Science
#285
of 1,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,588
of 68,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Aerosol Science
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.