↓ Skip to main content

Development of an instrument for the dynamic generation of test gases

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, January 1986
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development of an instrument for the dynamic generation of test gases
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, January 1986
DOI 10.1007/bf00983404
Authors

H. Weber, H. Stenner, A. Kettrup

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 1 50%
Engineering 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 1995.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#2,202
of 9,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,973
of 42,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#5
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,618 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 42,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.