↓ Skip to main content

First Evidence for Adoption in California Sea Lions

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
First Evidence for Adoption in California Sea Lions
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0013873
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ramona Flatz, Leah R. Gerber

Abstract

Demographic parameters such as birth and death rates determine the persistence of populations. Understanding the mechanisms that influence these rates is essential to developing effective management strategies. Alloparental behavior, or the care of non-filial young, has been documented in many species and has been shown to influence offspring survival. However, the role of alloparental behavior in maintaining population viability has not been previously studied. Here, we provide the first evidence for adoption in California sea lions and show that adoption potentially works to maintain a high survival rate of young and may ultimately contribute to population persistence. Alloparental behavior should have a positive effect on the population growth rate when the sum of the effects on fitness for the alloparent and beneficiary is positive.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Netherlands 1 2%
Hungary 1 2%
China 1 2%
Mexico 1 2%
Unknown 49 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 24%
Student > Master 12 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 20%
Other 3 5%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 6 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 55%
Environmental Science 8 15%
Psychology 3 5%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 8 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2022.
All research outputs
#4,590,056
of 25,165,154 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#78,107
of 218,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,718
of 106,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#336
of 1,026 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,165,154 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 218,254 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,026 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.